At this stage, ANYTHING that comes from the pro-vax side and I mean ANYTHING should be viewed with complete skepticism.

"Deer notes that he never accused Wakefield of fraud over his interpretation of pathology records.
Deer's articles themselves did not allege fraud, but on their basis a BMJ editorial in January 2011 called the paper fraudulent."

Fiona Godlee, the editor of the BMJ, says that the journal's conclusion of fraud was not based on the pathology but on a number of discrepancies between the children's records and the claims in the Lancet paper. She says she will be calling for a public inquiry into the matter, noting that it has been more than a year since she first informed UCL about concerns over Wakefield's work.

https://www.nature.com/articles/479157a